Olive Ridleys, Tata, and Ratan’s Turtles
July 16, 2008
Hi,
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has classified ‘Olive Ridley Turtles’ as vulnerable to extinction (although some sites claim that they are classified as endangered.
These turtles are found in very few spots around the world (click here to see the WWF map showing their habitats), and Gahirmatha is the world’s largest nesting ground for these poor amphibians.
The turtles lay eggs during April and May every year, and till recently no body seemed to care for them.
Now however there are a few efforts to help the olive ridley turtles.
In February last year, Tata Steel and L&T Ltd decided to build “an all-weather deep port at a location north of the mouth of river Dhamra in Orissa”and that was when all the action started. The project called the Dharma Port project, is apparently a long overdue plan, first started in 1998, but halted due to various problems.
Soon after the port project was announced, an MP requested that the test firing of missiles (that takes place every year during April and May at Gahirmatha), be stopped. The DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) however claimed that missile testing isn’t any deterrent at all to turtle nesting (I agree with you they are slightly eccentric) 
Now there are two possible reasons why turtles don’t come and lay eggs at their favorite spots.
1. This is a very famous hypothesis, though it hasn’t been scientifically established yet – lights. Bright lights, say some scientists drive away turtles.
2. People eat the poor turtles and their eggs.
It is illegal to kill turtles and eat them, we all know that. Lots of trawlers (big ships that catch fish) however have not installed “Turtle Excluding Devices” in their nets (apparently they think that their catch is reduced by installing these devices, although WWF authorities claim that it doesn’t)
Okay so what happened next? Next big new about the turtles was that the Orissa State government banned fishing for a six month period.
The thing about the turtles that really intrigued me was that they lay eggs in hordes. Thousands of them come at the same time and lay their eggs together (scientists claim that these are their strengths as a struggling species).

The third very interesting thing is that Greenpeace got involved, and the issue took huge proportions. Greenpeace activists started dressing up as turtles, sent an email petition signed by many people to Ratan Tata, and carried out other means of peaceful protest.

In reply to all this, the company officials said that the port would not in anyway disturb the turtles
Yes, the turtle friends replied to this too, saying the panel’s decision was all messed up.
What most people don’t know is that the entire project itself might be a little jinxed.
It seems the International Sea Port’s consortium, does not like the pace at which the papers are being moved at Orissa, and might decide to pull out of the project. If this happens, the entire project may be stopped
Hmmm, seems like Ratan Tata alone is not responsible for the project – but he is the face of the project and should do something.
If you’d like to send an email asking Ratan Tata to change the location of the Dharma Port,click here
update: Tata is holding talks with Greenpeace now!
Cheers,
Kaber
P.S: If you liked this essay, read these also
Entry Filed under: Articles|Ideas. Tags: Dhrama port, greenpeace, news, olive ridley turtles, Orissa Tata issue, petition against Dharma port, random, ratan tata.
16 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

1.
Norbert | February 10, 2009 at 11:29 am
Thanks for blogging about the campaign to save the Olive Ridleys from Tata’s destructive port at Dhamra. We need your help again. Could you please email me at,
nlincoln(at)in(dot)greenpeace(dot)org
2.
Meghna | May 19, 2009 at 5:57 pm
Around 1.7 Lakhs turtles had nested in Gahirmatha Beach, Orissa during Mar 21 – 24, 2009
Olive Ridley turtles begin nesting in Gahirmatha
3.
John | May 19, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Animated youtube video about turtles nesting in India. ENJOY!
Turtles are BACK!
4.
Ms. Mehta | May 27, 2009 at 12:25 pm
According to Greenpeace, Dhamra port project will directly affect the Olive Ridley turtles, their mating, nesting etc. however found this video worth sharing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-10fqlbU5U
Even after huge Greenpeace propaganda, turtles came back for nesting at Gahirmatha beach, which is located near Dhamra port project.
Like to share few more stories:
http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?654147
http://futureberhampur.blogspot.com/2009/05/olive-ridley-turtles-hatchlings-emerge.html
I think Greenpeace problem lies here: “After all, Tata has grown from a national giant into an international player”
5.
Jess | June 3, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Have a look at http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=41645784174&topic=305078
Its says:
6.
Aakansha | June 15, 2009 at 11:33 am
Thanks Jess for sharing the blogspot link with us.
Check this press release which is worth reading.
7.
Meghna | July 6, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Greenpeace to see exclusive olive ridley turtles video shared by DPCL:
8.
Tina | July 8, 2009 at 4:39 pm
Know more about Dhamra Port Project
http://www.slideshare.net/John_SM/ecofriendly-dhamra
9.
Jessica | July 27, 2009 at 4:46 pm
“Greenpeace has been variously criticized for being too radical, too alarmist, or too mainstream, for using methods bordering on eco-terrorism, for having itself caused environmental damage in its activities, for taking positions which are not environmentally or economically sound, and for valuing non-human causes over human causes. These criticisms have been made by governments, industrial and political lobbyists and other environmental groups.”
Greenpeace Lies About Apple
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Home/E83D58B3-10E0-4A9C-8847-BCE665EE235C.html
Greenpeace Lies About Dhamra Port
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r39coHPJKdU
Is that like Greenpeace always targets big corporate giant to keep them under pressure and earn money from them ultimately?
I wonder why a non-governmental organization for the protection and conservation of the environment do not like to protect the human beings. I have found in few countries innocent & poor people require protections, importance more than animals.
Why they have been kept ignored and leave behind by this type of so called good organizations.
GREENPEACE HAS NO RIGHT TO CREATE OBSTACLES FOR THE ECONOMICAL & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF ANY OTHER COUNTRY.
10.
Tina | August 14, 2009 at 2:47 pm
“It is sad that we first decide a villain and then find the proof to crucify them, when our concern could be about the turtles and people of Orissa and finding out ways so that both prosper.” – Cyber activist blogger’s viewpoint on Greenpeace and the turtles
11.
RMegha | August 19, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Dhamra Port Project is not only concern about the Orissa’s economy or the society’s betterment but they are also concern about the environmental protection. A very nice video which you will definitely like to share with others
12.
Aakash | August 27, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Light and lighting are crucial for any industrial project, both during construction and the operational phase. IUCN lighting experts and DPCL are also taking care of implementing lighting safeguards, which would also be turtle safe lighting and would be low pressure sodium vapor lights which have been proven by research to be the least disorienting to turtle hatchlings.
Source: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=296928&id=168851070709
13.
Jessica | August 29, 2009 at 4:15 pm
Mr Ratan Tata Chairman of TATA Steel to Greenpeace activists: “I invite you for a discussion and a visit to the port site in Dhamra.”
Tata proved that Tata was always willing to have a best solution for country’s industrial & economical development and they were always ready for solutions.
http://steelguru.com/news/index/2009/08/29/MTA5MDgw/TATA_Steel_invites_Greenpeace_activists_for_talks_on_Dhamra_Port.html
http://www.indopia.in/India-usa-uk-news/latest-news/661058/Business/4/20/4
http://www.newkerala.com/nkfullnews-1-100917.html
14.
Tina | September 14, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Greenpeace, the professed global environment campaign organization, in an instance of unmatched brazenness, falsified the report prepared by North Orissa University on Biodiversity Assessment of Dhamra Estuary. As a result, a group of forty MPs wrote to the Ministry Of Environment and Forests to call on the bluff of Greenpeace. The Orissa Govt. therefore initiated action against Greenpeace proposing a ban on all its activities in the state.
However, after the 102nd Annual General Meeting of Tata Steel in Mumbai, Greenpeace unabashedly has started their tricks once again. This time it has managed to rope in Retd Admiral Ramdas and his wife Mrs. Lalita Ramdas on the issue of Dhamra port but as far as scientific reasoning goes, the issues raised are totally unfounded. We can just hope that the visit of the Ramdas’ to the site will help to stop meaningless agitations and clear the situation once and for all.
15.
Meghna | September 16, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Tata Steel has always maintained a strong focus on environment sustainability and environment management in all its operations. We have seen that in the issues regarding the construction of a deep-sea port at Dhamra in Orissa, the Company has been forthcoming in sharing the concerns of activists and ever willing to implement practical means of mitigating any adverse impact of port construction on the marine eco-system in that area. The Company has held at least eight to nine sessions of meetings with Greenpeace and other environmental organizations in the matter of Dhamra Port. Tata Steel has made it abundantly clear that it is willing to have further discussions in order to alleviate any unnecessary doubts that the dissenters may yet nurture against the project.
Here is an outline of events as they happened till date.
The JV agreement with L&T to build a port at Dhamra was signed by Tata Steel in 2004. At the very onset, discussions were initiated with WWF- India, BNHS, Mr Kartik Shankar, Mr Bittu Sehagal and others.
The company was duly concerned with the objections raised by different environmental organizations and agreed not to begin construction work till a detailed study was complete. Responding wholeheartedly to the demands of activists, Tata Steel agreed for a proposal for a further study of the impact of the port on turtles and on the marine and island eco-system.
In 2005, BNHS and WWF-India, with an unprecedented suddenness, reversed their stand and refused to conduct the assessment study as they had promised. However, the organisations did not provide any reasons for their turncoat attitude.
In March 06, in an address to ED, Greenpeace India, the Chairman of TATA Sons made it clear that commitments were meant to be honoured at both ends. The Company had fulfilled their promise by withholding construction work for the proposed study, which never actually took off. The MD of Tata Steel also met Greenpeace officials in their Bangalore office.
In January 2008 a meeting was subsequently conducted between Greenpeace and Tata Steel and a list of concerns was presented by Greenpeace with regard to Dhamra Port. DPCL on 8th March 2008, gave a detailed and comprehensive explanation to all the points raised by Greenpeace. Subsequent objections were allayed on 3rd May 2008.
Further on 23rd October 2008, MD, Tata Steel along with senior executives of Tata Steel, L&T and DPCL met Greenpeace, BNHS, WPSI, Wild Society of Orissa, Sanctuary Asia and other environmental organizations to discuss the concerns and the way forward on the subject with regard to Dhamra Port.
A team of Company Executives and environment experts visited Bhitarakanika National Park, Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary and the Dhamra Port site on February 2009, supervising the ongoing dredging operations.
On fourth meeting on 20th Feb 2009 in Kolkata, Tata Steel, L&T and DPCL agreed to conduct the additional biological impact assessment in close collaboration with NGOs’ of environmental organizations team led by a mutually agreed upon Scientists team. However the NGOs’ in a further instance of unreasonableness, insisted upon complete cessation of on-going dredging operation of Dhamra Port even before the commencement of study. However DPCL, Tata Steel and L&T team showed it preparedness to adjust the schedule of works including dredging to facilitate the study after due recommendation by the Scientists team.
The 102nd AGM of Tata Steel had been attended by a number of Greenpeace activists who happen to be shareholders of the Company as well. The AGM highlighted Tata Steel’s interests in further conference with Greenpeace in the matter of the port in addition to an invitation to activists to visit the port site yet again.
From the sequence of events, it is absolutely clear that the only thing that Greenpeace wants is to prolong the situation of deadlock in the matter of Dhamra Port. Perhaps, due to a lack of other valid issues on their agenda, Greenpeace is carrying on with a stance of stiffness, lest they have to give in to valid scientific reasoning. The only deduction that may be drawn from Greenpeace’s lack of willingness in discussion is that they have lost their own conviction long before and fear that they will have to admit it as such in an open forum. It is indeed a very sorry state of affairs in which progress is kept at stake and the environment is being used as a pawn by people who profess themselves to be friends of the environment.
16.
Aakansha | September 22, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Some shareholders of Tata Steel brought up the concerns raised by Greenpeace about the impact of the Dhamra Port on the nesting habitat of Olive Ridley Turtles at Tata Steel’s 102nd AGM in Mumbai on the 27th August’09 and requested the Chairman of Tata Steel, Mr Ratan Tata, to discuss the Dhamra Port issue with them.
Mr Tata responded immediately to their concerns and said that my invitation is “ to you Admiral Ramdas” and anybody else who would be interested and Mr Muthuraman would make the arrangements for you all to take the time to satisfy yourselves in terms of what we are doing.
Know more: Response to GPs activity on Websites